| Author |
Message |
|
Dutch
|
 Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 1:47 am |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 08, 2009 10:50 pm
Posts: 15
|
|
Hello all,
As i was speaking with soem leadership in the ATC, I would like to bring up the topic of TS.
During the commanders meetings (before the campaign started) it was agreed upon to use TS2 for now as TS3 was quite new and maybe unstable.
This was 2 months ago and in the meantime alot of updates were doen on TS3.
Now my question / suggestion is, should we try to use TS3 for the next battle?
We can always keep TS2 as ATC backup comms server.
Some input from BLUFOR and REDFOR leadership plz.
_________________ Yours sincerely, E. Dutch Unit19 CEO http://www.unit19.org
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Walker001
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:00 am |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2009 7:08 pm
Posts: 24
|
|
Speaking for UNA, we are definilty okay with using TS3 for the future. We have been using TS3 since the beta was launched and, in the last few weeks we havent had any problems with it. But before we make any decision to change i hope that the other commanders take the chance to give their opinion aswell.
_________________
REDFOR Field Commander Walker
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
{bdr}*nemesi*
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 12:54 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:22 pm
Posts: 658
|
|
Thanks Walker for giving us your opinion
For me is OK to use TS3, if all commanders agree, just tell me what is your decision (in any case the TS2 server would be available for a while before closing it when it has proven TS3 has no issues)
Best regards
_________________
Respectfully,
Nemesi,
Chief of Staff
Arma Tactical Combat
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
[deltafr]cobra
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:11 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 11:22 pm
Posts: 8
Location: Orleans France
|
|
Yes, TS3 is better than TS2 !
we lost some important times to configure all time TS2 in last minute before battle.
YES FOR TS3 !
_________________
|
|
| Top |
|
|
